How institutions think: Re-thinking, Unlearning, Re-making
What alternative institutional models and methodologies are needed to respond to the complexities of the contemporary planetary condition? To what extent do current art institutions genuinely support artists and cultural workers? What does it mean to build an art institution today and what should the institution of tomorrow look like? How can institutions develop sustainable financial and organizational models that do not rely on extractive or precarious systems? Is institution-building still a viable or desirable project, and under what conditions does it make sense?
This panel examines how art institutions can be reconfigured in response to the complexities of the contemporary planetary condition, focusing on the need for alternative institutional models, governance structures, and methodologies. Moving beyond critique alone, it asks what it means to build an institution today, and what the institution of tomorrow might look like. To what extent do current structures truly support artists and cultural workers, and where do they fall short? How can institutions operate financially, ethically, and structurally in more sustainable and equitable ways while addressing the entangled crises of the present?
At its core, the discussion considers how institutions can shift away from centralized, extractive, and neoliberal frameworks toward models grounded in cooperation, shared responsibility, and long-term thinking. It explores how curatorial practice can function as a form of organizing shaping not only exhibitions, but also the infrastructures, relationships, and conditions through which art is produced and experienced. This includes questioning how decisions are made, how resources are distributed, and whether institutions can be built upon clear ethical principles.
Ultimately, the panel asks what is required to develop a progressive, curatorially led, and globally networked institution capable of responding to contemporary realities. By foregrounding collaboration, care, and accountability, it positions the institution not as a fixed structure, but as an evolving site of negotiation—one that must continuously rethink its role, purpose, and responsibility within a rapidly changing world.